• Site search

News - Mortgages

A&L fined £7m for PPI failings

Mortgage Solutions | 07 Oct 2008 | 12:52

The FSA has fined Alliance & Leicester (A&L) £7m for serious failings in its telephone sales of payment protection insurance (PPI).

The regulator said that from January 2005 to December 2007 A&L sold approximately 210,000 PPI policies to customers seeking a personal loan at an average price of £1,265, but there was a general failure by advisers to give customers details of the cost of PPI. In addition A&L sought to find reasons to sell PPI without properly considering what customers needed.

The FSA said A&L did not make it sufficiently clear that PPI was optional and it trained its staff to put pressure on customers where they queried the inclusion of PPI in their quotation or challenged advisers’ recommendations.

A&L has agreed to implement a substantial and comprehensive customer contact programme, overseen by third party accountants. It will write to all customers who took out policies by telephone in conjunction with an unsecured loan between 14 January 2005 and 31 December 2007 prompting them to review their policy against product information sent to them. It will also review any relevant rejected complaints and claims and has committed to pay redress where appropriate.

This remedial action has been taken into account by the FSA and has reduced the level of penalty which would otherwise have been imposed on the firm.

Margaret Cole, director of enforcement at the FSA, said: “The failings at A&L are the most serious we have found. This is reflected in the record PPI fine. It is very disappointing that after three years of regulation we are still finding serious problems in PPI sales.

“This case shows that we will continue to step up the action we take when firms do not sell PPI properly. Customers should be able to rely on impartial advice based on their individual needs and demands. It is particularly unacceptable for a firm to train its advisers to put pressure on customers when recommending insurance cover which they have not asked for and may not need. Firms cannot rely on paperwork sent out later as an excuse for unclear or misleading statements given on the telephone.”

Categories: Mortgages
  • Print this page
  • Comment on this article
  • Share

Recent comments

There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment.

Latest jobs

Job of the week

Audio/Video

Reasons to be Cheerful

Events

Other services

Coffee Lounge

ADVERTISEMENT